Tag: beautifulgame

  • Chelsea v Newcastle

    Game Moments

    Hello again!

    Chelsea arrived after an away fixture against PSG in the Champions League, where poor individual performances and defensive errors resulted in a 5-2 defeat. They therefore looked to respond domestically, but Newcastle is one of the most challenging opponents for a recovery performance.

    First Half Analysis

    Chelsea initially focused on the right side, combining through Palmer and Gusto during the opening 15 minutes. Although they dominated possession in this period, they created only one clear opportunity from open play.

    Off the ball, Newcastle defended in a 4-1-4-1 mid-to-low block. In this structure, they left Anthony Gordon as the highest player, targeting to attack quickly from the transition play. By applying man to man pressure onto the double pivot of Reece James and Moisés Caicedo during Chelsea’s 2-2 build-up, Newcastle disrupted Chelsea’s ability to progress centrally.

    Newcastle showed little intention to dominate possession in the early stages. Despite Chelsea’s intense high press limiting their time on the ball, Newcastle scored with their second meaningful possession sequence, completing a 15 consecutive pass move before finishing

    Chelsea’s consistently high defensive line, maintained in a flat back four, was again exposed. Following sustained possession, Livramento carried the ball through the half space. As Chalobah lost his position, a well-timed pass into the space allowed Joe Willock and Gordon to combine and give Newcastle the lead.

    Chelsea ended the first half with 66% possession, building primarily through the right side. Gusto alone delivered five crosses in the first half. Against Newcastle’s deeper defensive phases, Gordon remained close to Reece James to limit his involvement in build-up.

    In the first half, Alejandro Garnacho provided the width on the left side. With Livramento remaining tight to Garnacho, Marc Cucurella attacked the space between Livramento and Thiaw through underlapping runs into the half-space.

    Newcastle adjusted this approach in the second half. Livramento stayed narrower and closer to Thiaw, allowing Garnacho more space in wide areas while protecting the inside channel more effectively.


    Second Half Performance

    Chelsea began the second half with changes involving Gusto and Liam Delap. As a result, Reece James moved to right-back, and Chelsea shifted into a 4-4-2 formation with Delap and Pedro leading the line.

    Despite the structural change, their tactical approach remained largely the same.  Garnacho continued to provide width on the left, while James held the width on the right, allowing Palmer to occupy the half-space.  However, Newcastle’s 5-4-1 block effectively closed central spaces and prevented progression between the lines.

    Unable to create through central areas, Chelsea continued to rely on crosses throughout the second half. Although they managed to isolate Garnacho in 1v1 situations, he struggled to beat his opponent and failed to generate significant attacking output.

    Following the introduction of Hato and Fofana in the 82nd minute, Chelsea adjusted their build-up structure. They began constructing play with a back three, attempting to stretch Newcastle’s compact defensive block by increasing the width of the pitch. During this phase, Garnacho operated on the right, while Cucurella held the left touchline.

    Despite these adjustments, Chelsea was unable to create any clear chances and ultimately left the game without a result.


    Final Thoughts

    Chelsea’s use of a high defensive line in a flat back four once again proved costly. Newcastle’s compact defensive structure effectively closed central spaces and forced Chelsea to attack through wide areas.

    Chelsea delivered a total of 28 crosses during the match, highlighting their reliance on wide play.

    Newcastle’s decision to position Woltemade within midfield while leaving Gordon high provided a constant threat in transition, allowing them to attack quickly and efficiently after regaining possession.

  • Liverpool v Brighton

    Game Moments

    Hello! Today, I’ll be looking at the game moments and the statistics and overall performance in the Liverpool vs. Brighton match. Once again, Liverpool showed how dangerous they can be with direct play. Over the past few years, pressing has become embedded in their DNA, and we can see how effectively they implement it, adapting their pressing with different formations. With this win, Liverpool has now collected the most points in the first 10 weeks of a season over the last four years. Meanwhile, Brighton continues to demonstrate consistency, maintaining a similar points tally in the first 10 games across recent seasons.

    The first half of the Liverpool-Brighton match was relatively balanced. Liverpool started with a high press, usually led by Nunez, but their pressing formations varied, switching between a 4-3-3 and a 4-2-3-1. Brighton responded calmly to Liverpool’s press, mainly trying to break through the center, and they found success with this approach. Brighton’s first goal came after Ayari picked up the ball in the center, turned towards goal, and launched a dangerous attack. With Ferdi’s control and direction change, they exploited the space at the back to score, putting Brighton up 1-0. Around the 26th minute, Brighton almost doubled their lead when Ayari again found space centrally and played a ball in behind Van Dijk. Liverpool’s press was less effective as Gravenberch held back and didn’t join centrally, making it easier for Brighton to exploit the middle repeatedly.

    Brighton creates space in the center of the pitch.

    Brighton exploits space in the center, with Ayari playing a through pass behind Van Dijk.

    Liverpool could have benefited from directing their press more toward Brighton’s right side. Throughout the match, Brighton barely used the right side for their build-up, instead focusing on Mitoma on the left and isolating Ferdi on the right. When Liverpool directed Brighton’s play toward Gakpo and Tsimikas’s side, they regained possession more quickly.

    Liverpool forcing the Brighton to their right side and wins the ball

    In the first half, Trent held a deeper position on the right, forming an almost flat back four. His role changed in the second half, as he moved more centrally and even drifted to the left to support the build-up. McAllister also drifted left in the first half to create an overload on the left side, but Liverpool couldn’t fully capitalize on the spaces Brighton left in the central area.

    In the second half, Liverpool continued with intense pressing, but gaps in the center remained. With Trent’s adjusted role in the build-up, McAllister advanced to a more central position. Brighton kept trying to break through the center. As Gravenberch joined the press more frequently, Welbeck dropped deeper to support the build-up, exploiting the space Gravenberch left.

    Liverpool effectively used direct play in the second half, creating a dangerous opportunity with only three passes after Salah switched the play to Gakpo, showing just how effective Liverpool’s direct style can be. They continued to find success with quick, direct plays, especially when Jones and Diaz combined to assist Salah’s goal.

    Overall, while Liverpool didn’t create many chances from positional plays, their quick, direct approach secured the victory. In the second half, as Liverpool dropped back to protect their lead, Brighton started using Van Hecke’s diagonal passes to reach Mitoma, capitalizing on Welbeck’s deep-dropping movements to isolate Trent against Mitoma in 1v1 situations.

    In summary, despite the balanced nature of the game, Liverpool’s direct play proved decisive. What are your thoughts on the Liverpool-Brighton match?